Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
661 University Ave
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.65945, -79.38955
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM11427 | ARE-BJ Holdints No. 1 Inc. | 661 University Ave. | Transit/TTC | 11 March 2008 – 11 March 2010 | 0 |
| SM11047 | ARE-BJ Holdlings No. 1 Inc | 661 University Ave. | Planning Application Site Plan, Building Permits, Encroachment Agreement | 11 February 2008 – 15 September 2012 | 0 |
| SM11073 | ARE-BJ Holdings No. 1 Inc. | 661 University Ave. | 661 University Ave. Planning Applications, Building Permits, Transit/TTC Applications and related m… | 11 February 2008 – 31 May 2012 | 0 |
| SM11529 | ARE-BJHoldings No. 1 Inc. | 661 University Ave. | 661 University Avenue - Building Permits | 11 February 2008 – 31 May 2012 | 0 |
| SM11530 | ARE-BJHoldings No. 1 Inc. | 661 University Ave. | 661 University Avenue - Transit/TTC | 11 February 2008 – 11 February 2012 | 0 |
| SM11845 | ARE-BJ Holdlings No. 1 Inc | 661 University AVe. | Transit/TTC | 11 February 2008 – 15 September 2012 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 11 December 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0112/18TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0112/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 11 December 2018 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 11
3 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.