Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
660 Eglinton Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.71176, -79.37621
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 12 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Robinson | Councillor staff | 17 | 1 | 14 July 2022 |
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 13 | 11 | 29 November 2017 |
| Rachel Chernos Lin | Member of council | 11 | 9 | 3 October 2025 |
| Development Review | City staff | 4 | 0 | 15 January 2025 |
| Jaye Robinson | Councillor staff | 4 | 3 | 7 May 2024 |
| Councillor Parker | Councillor staff | 3 | 3 | 22 April 2014 |
| Councillor Burnside | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 12 January 2015 |
| Office of Councillor Burnside | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 27 March 2017 |
| Ward 15 Don Valley West | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 10 March 2021 |
| Rachel Chernos Lin | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 10 January 2025 |
| Office of Councillor Burnside, Ward 26 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 30 August 2016 |
| Jaye Robinson | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 2 March 2023 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35565 | Concert Properties Ltd | 660 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning… | 7 May 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 16 |
| SM26015 | RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 660 Eglinton Ave. E. | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 7 April 2018 – 7 April 2027 | 4 |
| SM25428 | Concert Properties Ltd | 660 Eglinton Avenue East. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 29 November 2017 – 30 September 2023 | 22 |
| SM23479 | RioCan Management (Sunnybrook) Inc. | 660 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 29 August 2016 – 20 December 2016 | 0 |
| SM23480 | RioCan Holdings (Sunnybrook) Inc. | 660 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 29 August 2016 – 29 December 2018 | 2 |
| SM20340 | RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 660 Eglinton Ave. E. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 April 2014 – 31 December 2024 | 18 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 15 December 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 266344 NNY 15 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 20 December 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 252497 NNY 15 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 24 April 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 143856 NNY 15 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 267342 NNY 26 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 266344 NNY 15 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 December 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 252497 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 December 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 143856 NNY 15 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 April 2019 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 14 267342 NNY 26 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
660 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 252497 NNY 15 OZ · submitted 20 December 2024 · Under Review · from registration SM35565 (Concert Properties Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35565: 660 Eglinton Avenue East and 278 Bessborough Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 252497 NNY 15 OZ at 660 Eglinton Ave E: Rezoning Application to permit a transit supportive mixed-use development featuring three towers of 32, 37 and 43 storeys, A total of 1,201 dwelling units and 419 parking spaces. Provision of both purpose-built rental and condominium units 84,134 square metres of gross floor area, 82,675 square met… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 660 Eglinton Avenue East and 278 Bessborough Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
660 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 267342 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 23 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM23479 (RioCan Management (Sunnybrook) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23479: 660 Eglinton Avenue East Rezoning (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 267342 NNY 26 OZ at 660 Eglinton Ave E: This application proposes to amend the former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law No. 1916 to permit a 19-storey (66 metre) and a 13-storey (46 metre) apartment building with retail at grade (2,121 m2). The two buildings would contain a total of 408 dwelling units and 410 parking spaces with 395 located … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 660 Eglinton Avenue East Rezoning
Matched fields
- address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
660 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 267342 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 23 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM23480 (RioCan Holdings (Sunnybrook) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23480: 660 Eglinton Avenue East Rezoning (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 267342 NNY 26 OZ at 660 Eglinton Ave E: This application proposes to amend the former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law No. 1916 to permit a 19-storey (66 metre) and a 13-storey (46 metre) apartment building with retail at grade (2,121 m2). The two buildings would contain a total of 408 dwelling units and 410 parking spaces with 395 located … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 660 Eglinton Avenue East Rezoning
Matched fields
- address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
660 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 267342 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 23 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM25428 (Concert Properties Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25428: Planning and redevelopment of Sunnybrook Plaza located at 660 Eglinton Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 267342 NNY 26 OZ at 660 Eglinton Ave E: This application proposes to amend the former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law No. 1916 to permit a 19-storey (66 metre) and a 13-storey (46 metre) apartment building with retail at grade (2,121 m2). The two buildings would contain a total of 408 dwelling units and 410 parking spaces with 395 located … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and redevelopment of Sunnybrook Plaza located at 660 Eglinton Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 660 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 15% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 30% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.