Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley

66 Jutland Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 3; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 7; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Location: 43.62780, -79.52302
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Dunpar Developments Inc.SM27632 · 8 February 20193

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Office of Councillor Grimes, Ward 32
Economic Development & Culture1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Grimes, Ward 3	Councillor staff	2	1	20 February 2019
Economic Development & Culture	City staff	1	0	1 March 2019

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM27632	Dunpar Developments Inc.	66 Jutland Rd.	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	8 February 2019 – 31 December 2022	3

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 12 May 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 158168 WET 03 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 21 February 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0084/25EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 4 November 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5537524Cancelled · Withdrawn
Submitted 7 March 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 120794 WET 03 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 21 September 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 215835 WET 03 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 6 July 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 163764 WET 03 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 22 December 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 278837 WET 05 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 7 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
25 158168 WET 03 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	12 May 2025	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0084/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 February 2025	Closed Approved
COA-5537524 Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	4 November 2024	Cancelled Withdrawn
23 120794 WET 03 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	7 March 2023	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
21 215835 WET 03 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	21 September 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 163764 WET 03 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	6 July 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 278837 WET 05 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	22 December 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

66 Jutland Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 278837 WET 05 SA · submitted 22 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27632 (Dunpar Developments Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27632: Application for Site Plan Approval 66 Jutland Rd. App. No. 17 27 8837 WET 05 SA (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 278837 WET 05 SA at 66 Jutland Rd: The proposed development consists of 50 industrial units with a total gross floor area of 11,636 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application for Site Plan Approval 66 Jutland Rd. App. No. 17 27 8837 WET 05 SA
Matched fields
address
66 JUTLAND RD
application_address
66 JUTLAND RD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3

4 lobbied · 265 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3: 4 lobbied and 265 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	265	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied71% n=10

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied29%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	24	—	100% (n=5)	0%	4%	0.25
Matched, unlobbied	100	—	71% (n=10)	29%	4%	0.14

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide