Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
66 Broadway Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.71066, -79.39548
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Robinson | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 11 May 2017 |
| Councillor Justin Di Ciano | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 23 May 2017 |
| Councillor Justin DiCiano | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 23 May 2017 |
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 9 May 2017 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24242 | Beaux Properties International Inc. | 66 Broadway Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 24 March 2017 – 25 May 2020 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 22 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270243 NNY 25 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 270243 NNY 25 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
66 Broadway Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 270243 NNY 25 SA · submitted 22 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24242 (Beaux Properties International Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24242: Assisting with the site plan and zoning for 66 Broadway Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270243 NNY 25 SA at 66 Broadway Ave: An application to permit a two-storey, 18 unit addition to the existing 20 storey, 356 unit rental building for a total of 22 storeys and 374 units, and to permit a new four-storey townhouse block comprised of 20 stacked townhouse units fronting Broadway Avenue. Associated Zoning By-law Amendment A… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the site plan and zoning for 66 Broadway Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 66 BROADWAY AVE
- application_address
- 66 BROADWAY AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.