Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
64 Prince Arthur Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66926, -79.39938
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 17 July 2023 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34482 | Forgestone Capital | 64 Prince Arthur Ave | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 9 May 2023 – 1 April 2024 | 1 |
| SM25510 | Adi Development Group Inc. | 64 Prince Arthur Avenue. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-… | 11 January 2018 – 31 December 2020 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 9 June 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0545/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 29 April 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 141761 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 17 July 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 175768 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 August 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 226254 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0545/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 9 June 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 141761 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 April 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 23 175768 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 July 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 226254 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 August 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
64 Prince Arthur Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 175768 STE 11 OZ · submitted 17 July 2023 · Closed · from registration SM34482 (Forgestone Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34482: 64 Prince Arthur Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 175768 STE 11 OZ at 64 Prince Arthur Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 13-storey residential building, containing 95 dwelling units. An Official Plan Amendment was requested to ensure the conformity of the proposed built form but was deemed unnecessary. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 64 Prince Arthur Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 64 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
- application_address
- 64 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
64 Prince Arthur Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 226254 STE 20 OZ · submitted 31 August 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25510 (Adi Development Group Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25510: The property is located at 64 Prince Arthur Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 226254 STE 20 OZ at 64 Prince Arthur Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 19-storey residential building (height 73 metres): 178 dwelling units, 13,052 sq. m. RGFA, 149 parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: The property is located at 64 Prince Arthur Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 64 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
- application_address
- 64 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.