Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
630 Kipling Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.61963, -79.52725
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 9 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 19 October 2013 |
| Councillor Justin DiCiano | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 26 June 2017 |
| Ward 12 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 August 2011 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 August 2011 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 August 2011 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 August 2011 |
| Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 August 2011 |
| Ward 38 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 15 December 2013 |
| Ward 9 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 15 December 2013 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24778 | Craft Development Corporation | 630 Kipling Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 26 June 2017 – 26 December 2018 | 1 |
| SM19779 | Craft Development Corporation | 630 Kipling Ave | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 20 October 2013 – 30 October 2015 | 0 |
| SM19746 | Craft Development Corporation | 630 Kipling Ave | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 11 October 2013 – 11 March 2016 | 3 |
| SM16999 | Tayco Panelink Limited | 630 Kipling Ave. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 30 August 2011 – 3 September 2012 | 6 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 15 April 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 141224 WET 05 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 141224 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 April 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.