Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
625 Church St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66989, -79.38235
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 9 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 8 | 7 | 4 May 2021 |
| Office of Counillor Mike Layton Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 29 November 2018 |
| Councillor Mike Layton | Councillor staff | 5 | 1 | 29 April 2022 |
| Mike Layton | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 2 May 2022 |
| Office of Councillor Layton, Ward 11 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 7 December 2020 |
| Office of Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 13 November 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Layton Ward 11 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 17 December 2018 |
| Office of Mike Layton Councillor Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 23 November 2018 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 6 June 2017 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31529 | Colliers Strategy & Consulting | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 7 April 2021 – 31 August 2022 | 9 |
| SM28907 | Manulife Investment Management | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 25 September 2019 – 31 December 2022 | 0 |
| SM28574 | Manulife | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 10 July 2019 – 1 December 2020 | 1 |
| SM26968 | Colliers Project Leaders | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 November 2018 – 24 September 2019 | 10 |
| SM26969 | Colliers Project Leaders | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 November 2018 – 24 September 2019 | 2 |
| SM26970 | Colliers Project Leaders | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 November 2018 – 24 September 2019 | 1 |
| SM24677 | Manulife Real Estate | 625 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 6 June 2017 – 20 June 2023 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 30 April 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 148066 STE 11 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 20 December 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 263839 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 148066 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 April 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 263839 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
625 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 263839 STE 11 OZ · submitted 20 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28574 (Manulife)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28574: Redevelopment of 625 Church Street, Toronto ON, M4Y 2G1 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 263839 STE 11 OZ at 625 Church St: A Zoning By-law Amendment application for a new 59-storey (201.9 metres) mixed-use building. The development proposes to retain the west elevation of the existing 6-storey building in its entirety, as well as a portion of the north and south elevations. The proposed development includes 10,488 squa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 625 Church Street, Toronto ON, M4Y 2G1
Matched fields
- address
- 625 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 625 CHURCH ST
625 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 263839 STE 11 OZ · submitted 20 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28907 (Manulife Investment Management)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28907: Zoning by-law amendment for 625 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 263839 STE 11 OZ at 625 Church St: A Zoning By-law Amendment application for a new 59-storey (201.9 metres) mixed-use building. The development proposes to retain the west elevation of the existing 6-storey building in its entirety, as well as a portion of the north and south elevations. The proposed development includes 10,488 squa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning by-law amendment for 625 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Matched fields
- address
- 625 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 625 CHURCH ST
625 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 263839 STE 11 OZ · submitted 20 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM31529 (Colliers Strategy & Consulting)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31529: Seeking a zoning by-law amendment for 625 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 263839 STE 11 OZ at 625 Church St: A Zoning By-law Amendment application for a new 59-storey (201.9 metres) mixed-use building. The development proposes to retain the west elevation of the existing 6-storey building in its entirety, as well as a portion of the north and south elevations. The proposed development includes 10,488 squa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Seeking a zoning by-law amendment for 625 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 625 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 625 CHURCH ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.