Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
620 King St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64453, -79.40077
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 23 January 2013 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18862 | Allied Properties REIT | 620 King Street West | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 23 January 2013 – 23 January 2017 | 1 |
| SM12335 | One Financial Corporation | 620 King Street West | Planning and development application, Plan of Condominium | 15 September 2008 – 29 September 2009 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 6 September 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 221493 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 July 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 191429 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 August 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 215423 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 221493 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 September 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 191429 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 July 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 215423 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 August 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
505 Adelaide St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 215423 STE 20 OZ · submitted 2 August 2013 · Closed · from registration SM18848 (Allied Properties REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18848: Rezoning application - 602-620 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 215423 STE 20 OZ at 505 Adelaide St W: A Zoning Amendment application for a mixed-use development that includes a 14-storey office building adjoined by a 16-storey residential building. The proposed development shall include new residential gross floor area of 10,288m2. 116 units proposed. 23,041m2 of new office/retail space is proposed… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application - 602-620 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 602-620 KING ST W
- application_address
- 602 KING ST W
505 Adelaide St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 215423 STE 20 OZ · submitted 2 August 2013 · Closed · from registration SM18862 (Allied Properties REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18862: Planning and Development for 620 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 215423 STE 20 OZ at 505 Adelaide St W: A Zoning Amendment application for a mixed-use development that includes a 14-storey office building adjoined by a 16-storey residential building. The proposed development shall include new residential gross floor area of 10,288m2. 116 units proposed. 23,041m2 of new office/retail space is proposed… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development for 620 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 620 KING ST W
- application_address
- 620 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.