Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
609 Avenue Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68976, -79.40217
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 18 September 2014 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM20900 | State Building Group | 609 Avenue Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 18 September 2014 – 18 September 2016 | 1 |
| SM20895 | Toronto Standard Condominium Corp. No. 1516 | 609 Avenue Road | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 16 September 2014 – 31 October 2014 | 1 |
| SM20891 | Alan Hirschfield | 609 Avenue Road. | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 2 September 2014 – 16 June 2015 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 3 April 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0338/19TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0338/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 April 2019 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.