Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
608 Richmond St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64684, -79.40289
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 6 October 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 244509 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 October 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 254795 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 October 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 254797 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 244509 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 October 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 254795 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 October 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 254797 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 October 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
604 Richmond St W · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
17 244509 STE 20 CD · submitted 6 October 2017 · Closed · from registration SM21288 (Lamb Development Corp.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21288: Municipal Address for application -604-618 Richmond Street West Revisions we made to the plans prior to OMB hearing and to discuss next steps, including the canopy encroachment and tree permits, both of which will come to Community Council for a decision. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 244509 STE 20 CD at 604 Richmond St W: onstruct a new 14-storey mixed use building containing commercial uses at grade and 220 residential units above the ground floor. The total proposed residential GFA is 15333.23 m2 and the total proposed non-residential retail GFA is 498.03 m2. The proposal includes 4 1/2 level of below grade parkin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Municipal Address for application -604-618 Richmond Street West Revisions we made to the plans prior to OMB hearing and to discuss next steps, including the canopy encroachment and tr…
Matched fields
- address
- 604-618 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 604 RICHMOND ST W
610 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 254795 STE 20 OZ · submitted 22 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM21288 (Lamb Development Corp.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21288: Municipal Address for application -604-618 Richmond Street West Revisions we made to the plans prior to OMB hearing and to discuss next steps, including the canopy encroachment and tree permits, both of which will come to Community Council for a decision. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 254795 STE 20 OZ at 610 Richmond St W: To demolish existing residential and commercial buildings located on 604,606,610,614,616,&618 Richmond ST W (1.13 ha site) and construct a new 14-storey mixed use building containing commercial uses at grade and 218 residential units above the ground floor. The total proposed residential GFA is ~15… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Municipal Address for application -604-618 Richmond Street West Revisions we made to the plans prior to OMB hearing and to discuss next steps, including the canopy encroachment and tr…
Matched fields
- address
- 604-618 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 604 RICHMOND ST W
604 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 254797 STE 20 SA · submitted 22 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM21288 (Lamb Development Corp.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21288: Municipal Address for application -604-618 Richmond Street West Revisions we made to the plans prior to OMB hearing and to discuss next steps, including the canopy encroachment and tree permits, both of which will come to Community Council for a decision. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 254797 STE 20 SA at 604 Richmond St W: To demolish existing residential and commercial buildings located on 604,606,610,614,616,&618 Richmond ST W (1.13 ha site) and construct a new 14-storey mixed use building containing commercial uses at grade and 220 residential units above the ground floor. The total proposed residential GFA is 153… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Municipal Address for application -604-618 Richmond Street West Revisions we made to the plans prior to OMB hearing and to discuss next steps, including the canopy encroachment and tr…
Matched fields
- address
- 604-618 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 604 RICHMOND ST W
604 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 254797 STE 20 SA · submitted 22 October 2013 · Closed · from registration SM21472 (The Harlowe Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21472: 604-618 Richmond Street West applications (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 254797 STE 20 SA at 604 Richmond St W: To demolish existing residential and commercial buildings located on 604,606,610,614,616,&618 Richmond ST W (1.13 ha site) and construct a new 14-storey mixed use building containing commercial uses at grade and 220 residential units above the ground floor. The total proposed residential GFA is 153… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 604-618 Richmond Street West applications
Matched fields
- address
- 604-618 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 604 RICHMOND ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.