Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
60 Roselawn Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.71037, -79.40084
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 57 ROSELAWN AVE (3 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0186/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0187/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0188/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0189/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0190/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0191/21NYAccepted · In progress
- Submitted 23 February 2021Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0012/21NYApproved with Conditions · Approved
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0186/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0187/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0188/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0189/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0190/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0191/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | Accepted In progress |
| B0012/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 23 February 2021 | Approved with Conditions Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 8
7 lobbied · 357 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.