Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
6 Noble St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.64257, -79.43009
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Gordon Perks | Councillor staff | 3 | 1 | 18 April 2017 |
| Gord Perks | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 30 April 2024 |
| Gord Perks | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 23 April 2024 |
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 27 February 2017 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35488 | Minto (Noble) LP | 6 Noble Street | Planning and Development Application; Minor Variance | 10 April 2024 – 24 May 2024 | 5 |
| SM24148 | 6 Noble Street Developments Inc | 6 Noble Street. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 7 March 2017 – 25 May 2020 | 3 |
| SM24043 | Tawse Realco Inc. | 6 Noble Street. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 13 February 2017 – 31 December 2020 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 27 November 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1019/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 16 December 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 249220 STE 04 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 26 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 242229 STE 04 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 September 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 218808 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1019/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 November 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 21 249220 STE 04 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 16 December 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 242229 STE 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 16 218808 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 September 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
6 Noble St · Minor variance (MV)
A1019/23TEY · submitted 27 November 2023 · Closed · from registration SM35488 (Minto (Noble) LP)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35488: 6 Noble Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1019/23TEY at 6 Noble St: To alter the development standards for an 8-storey (33 m) mixed-use building (approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 862-2021(OLT)) by increasing the building height to 11-storey (43 m, including a mechanical penthouse), as well as the total gross floor area (from 9,500 m² to 12,110 m²), and to… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 6 Noble Street
Matched fields
- address
- 6 NOBLE ST
- application_address
- 6 NOBLE ST
6 Noble St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 242229 STE 04 SA · submitted 26 November 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM35488 (Minto (Noble) LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35488: 6 Noble Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 242229 STE 04 SA at 6 Noble St: Site Plan Approval for an 12-storey (41.5m) mixed-use building having a residential gross floor area of 12,069 square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 40 square metres. 169 residential dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 6 Noble Street
Matched fields
- address
- 6 NOBLE ST
- application_address
- 6 NOBLE ST
6 Noble St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 218808 STE 14 OZ · submitted 7 September 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24148 (6 Noble Street Developments Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24148: Assisting with zoning, permits and planning application for 6 Noble Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 218808 STE 14 OZ at 6 Noble St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to construct a 8-storey, mixed use building containing commercial use at grade, 132 residential units, and 61 below-grade parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with zoning, permits and planning application for 6 Noble Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 6 NOBLE ST
- application_address
- 6 NOBLE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 4
8 lobbied · 130 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 130 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.