6 Brendan Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 2; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Location: 43.69403, -79.37738
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Luigi FalzoneSM24208 · 14 March 20172

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Councillor Burnside1
Ward 26 Don Valley West1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Burnside	Councillor staff	1	0	14 March 2017
Ward 26 Don Valley West	Member of council	1	0	13 April 2017

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM24208	Luigi Falzone	6 Brendan Road	Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance	14 March 2017 – 14 March 2018	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 21 December 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0002/21NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 3 February 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0099/17NYClosed · Refused

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0002/21NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 December 2020	Closed Approved
A0099/17NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	3 February 2017	Closed Refused

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

6 Brendan Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0099/17NY · submitted 3 February 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24208 (Luigi Falzone)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24208: Minor variance re 6 Brendan Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0099/17NY at 6 Brendan Rd: To construct a new two-storey dwelling. The existing dwelling would be demolished. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor variance re 6 Brendan Road
Matched fields
address
6 BRENDAN RD
application_address
6 BRENDAN RD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 15

5 lobbied · 419 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 15: 5 lobbied and 419 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	419	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.