Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
577 Sheppard Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.76703, -79.38536
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 24 | Councillor staff | 4 | 4 | 19 August 2014 |
| Citizen Focus Services B | City staff | 1 | 0 | 1 September 2016 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19499 | Pine Ridge Building Corporation | 577 Sheppard Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium; Planning and Development Application, Si… | 10 July 2013 – 26 December 2019 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 25 September 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 238212 NNY 24 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 April 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 145584 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 August 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 225019 NNY 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 238212 NNY 24 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 25 September 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 145584 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 April 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 225019 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 August 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
7 Kenaston Gdns · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 145584 NNY 24 SA · submitted 22 April 2014 · Closed · from registration SM19499 (Pine Ridge Building Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19499: Planning Applications for redevelopment of mixed use condominium building for 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 145584 NNY 24 SA at 7 Kenaston Gdns: Site Plan Control Application to construct an 8 to 12 storey mixed use building containing 234 dwelling units, 240 square metres of grade related retail space and 207 parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning Applications for redevelopment of mixed use condominium building for 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 577 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 577 SHEPPARD AVE E
577 Sheppard Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 225019 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 22 August 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19499 (Pine Ridge Building Corporation)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM19499: Planning Applications for redevelopment of mixed use condominium building for 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 225019 NNY 24 OZ at 577 Sheppard Ave E: Proposed 8 to 12-storey, 245-unit mixed use building with 249 square metres of grade related retail, 214 parking spaces and a 227 square metre on-site parkland dedication. The proposed gross floor area is 18,223 square metres resulting in a density of 3.99 FSI. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning Applications for redevelopment of mixed use condominium building for 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 577 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 577 SHEPPARD AVE E
577 Sheppard Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 225019 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 22 August 2013 · Closed · from registration SM20077 (CFR INvestment Services,Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20077: 5 - 15 kenaston gardens (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 225019 NNY 24 OZ at 577 Sheppard Ave E: Proposed 8 to 12-storey, 245-unit mixed use building with 249 square metres of grade related retail, 214 parking spaces and a 227 square metre on-site parkland dedication. The proposed gross floor area is 18,223 square metres resulting in a density of 3.99 FSI. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5 - 15 kenaston gardens
Matched fields
- address
- 5-15 KENASTON GDNS
- application_address
- 5 KENASTON GDNS
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.