Address · Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
555 Rexdale Blvd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
- Location
- 43.70900, -79.60564
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
10These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Top 8Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning Dept. | City staff | 2 | 2 | 6 February 2013 |
| Etobicoke York District | City staff | 1 | 1 | 6 February 2013 |
| Legal Services | City staff | 1 | 1 | 6 February 2013 |
| Policy & Research | City staff | 1 | 1 | 6 February 2013 |
| Strategic Initiatives | City staff | 1 | 1 | 6 February 2013 |
| Vincent Crisanti | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 19 July 2023 |
All registrations· 10 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM37837 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Blvd | Economic Development; Planning and Development; Transit / TTC | 18 August 2026 – 31 January 2027 | 0 |
| SM37163 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Boulevard | Planning and Development; Transportation - Metrolinx | 1 November 2025 – 31 March 2027 | 0 |
| SM34655 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Boulevard | Planning and Development | 19 July 2023 – 17 February 2026 | 1 |
| SM18910 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Blvd. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 6 February 2013 – 31 March 2014 | 1 |
| SM18911 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Blvd. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 6 February 2013 – 14 July 2014 | 5 |
| SM13166 | UNITE HERE Local 75 | 555 Rexdale Boulevard | Planning and Development Application, OP and Zoning By-law | 18 June 2009 – 18 June 2010 | 0 |
| SM10610 | Woodbine Live! | 555 Rexdale Blvd. | planning and development: Planning Application, Zoning by-law, Site Plan Approval | 12 February 2008 – 11 October 2012 | 0 |
| SM10792 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Blvd. | TTC/Transit and transportation | 1 January 2008 – 23 December 2011 | 0 |
| SM11449 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Blvd. | Financial Services, Economic Development, Tourism, Housing, Social Services, Water, Roads/bridges | 1 January 2008 – 23 December 2011 | 0 |
| SM11450 | Woodbine Entertainment Group | 555 Rexdale Blvd. | Planning Application including, zoning, site plan, building permits, environment assessment | 1 January 2008 – 23 December 2011 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
12- Submitted 22 July 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0233/26EYKAccepted · In progress
- Submitted 22 July 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0234/26EYKAccepted · In progress
- Submitted 22 July 2026Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0024/26EYKAccepted · In progress
- Submitted 29 October 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 246260 WET 01 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 9 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 205173 WET 01 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 25 August 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 185079 WET 01 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 14 April 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0135/20EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 21 February 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 119828 WET 02 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 February 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 117779 WET 02 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 May 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 158697 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 May 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 158704 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 May 2017Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 17 158705 WET 02 SBDraft Plan Approved · Approved
Data table· 12 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0233/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 July 2026 | Accepted In progress |
| A0234/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 July 2026 | Accepted In progress |
| B0024/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 22 July 2026 | Accepted In progress |
| 25 246260 WET 01 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 October 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 205173 WET 01 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 October 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 185079 WET 01 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 August 2020 | Council Approved Approved |
| A0135/20EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 April 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 18 119828 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 February 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 117779 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 February 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 158697 WET 02 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 May 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 158704 WET 02 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 May 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 158705 WET 02 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 12 May 2017 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 1
2 lobbied · 42 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 42 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 1
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1
4 lobbied · 12 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.