Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
555 Finch Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.77160, -79.44738
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 30 | 5 | 30 October 2018 |
| Office of Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 10 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 24 January 2017 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 January 2020 |
| James Pasternak | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 July 2023 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23117 | Advent Health Care Corporation | 555 Finch Avenue West. | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 13 May 2016 – 12 May 2017 | 1 |
| SM23118 | Advent Health Care Corproation | 555 Finch Avenue West | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 13 May 2016 – 13 May 2017 | 1 |
| SM23001 | Advent Health Care Corporation | 555 Finch Ave West. | Planning and Development, Environmental Assessment; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 15 April 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 31 |
| SM11988 | Advent Health Care Corporation | 555 Finch Avenue West | Planning Applications: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments | 18 July 2008 – 16 March 2015 | 0 |
| SM11989 | Advent Health Care Corporation | 555 Finch Avenue West | Planning Applications: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments | 18 July 2008 – 28 August 2013 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 17 March 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0004/25NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 9 March 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0013/18NYClosed · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0004/25NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 17 March 2025 | Closed Approved |
| B0013/18NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 9 March 2018 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.