Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
5509 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.63165, -79.54507
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 18 December 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 251625 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 149707 WET 05 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 23 March 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 133602 WET 05 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 251625 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 December 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 149707 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 April 2018 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 18 133602 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 March 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5509 Dundas St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 149707 WET 05 SA · submitted 27 April 2018 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM30261 (Dundas Shorncliffe Limited Partnership)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30261: 5507 & 5509 Dundas Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 149707 WET 05 SA at 5509 Dundas St W: Proposal for a 22 storey mixed-use building including 6 affordable rental dwelling units, a POPS and a laneway easement. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5507 & 5509 Dundas Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 5507&5509 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5507 DUNDAS ST W
5509 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 133602 WET 05 OZ · submitted 23 March 2018 · Closed · from registration SM30261 (Dundas Shorncliffe Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30261: 5507 & 5509 Dundas Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 133602 WET 05 OZ at 5509 Dundas St W: The Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the Subject Lands for a 21-storey mixed use building. The proposed development would provide for a total of 21934 square metres of gross floor area comprised of 20,725 square metres of residential uses (95% of the total GFA), 1,… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5507 & 5509 Dundas Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 5507&5509 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5507 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | 1,629 | 70% (n=10) | 30% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.