Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
53 Judson St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.61501, -79.50152
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 3 May 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 153483 WET 06 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 4 November 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 247232 WET 06 OZUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 153483 WET 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 May 2017 | Under Review In progress |
| 15 247232 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 November 2015 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
49 Judson St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 247232 WET 06 OZ · submitted 4 November 2015 · Under Review · from registration SM27745 (Dunpar Developments Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27745: 49, 53, and 55 Judson Street -App. No. 15 247232 WET 06 OZ Review applicable Zoning Bylaw requirements and Settlement Discussions of Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 247232 WET 06 OZ at 49 Judson St: Proposed mix of residential townhouses and low-rise employment uses. The proposal includes three blocks of 4-storey residential townhouse units along the south side of Judson Street, containing a total of 72 units, and two blocks of 3-storey commercial condominium units on the southerly portion of … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 49, 53, and 55 Judson Street -App. No. 15 247232 WET 06 OZ Review applicable Zoning Bylaw requirements and Settlement Discussions of Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board
Matched fields
- file_number
- 15 247232 WET 06 OZ
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
49 Judson St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 247232 WET 06 OZ · submitted 4 November 2015 · Under Review · from registration SM22291 (Dunpar Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22291: 49-55 Judson Street Official Plan Amendment/Zoning Bylaw Amendment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 247232 WET 06 OZ at 49 Judson St: Proposed mix of residential townhouses and low-rise employment uses. The proposal includes three blocks of 4-storey residential townhouse units along the south side of Judson Street, containing a total of 72 units, and two blocks of 3-storey commercial condominium units on the southerly portion of … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 49-55 Judson Street Official Plan Amendment/Zoning Bylaw Amendment
Matched fields
- address
- 49-55 JUDSON ST
- application_address
- 49 JUDSON ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.