Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
5251 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.63816, -79.53782
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 6 February 2025 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35581 | CentreCourt | 5251 Dundas Street West | Building Permits; Planning and Development | 14 May 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 1 |
| SM34426 | CentreCourt | 5251 Dundas St West | Planning and Development Application | 17 April 2023 – 29 December 2023 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 26 February 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 121851 WET 03 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 7 August 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 206801 WET 03 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 17 June 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0245/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 12 August 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0322/24EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 12 March 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0124/24EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 26 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 138274 WET 03 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 251071 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 121851 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 February 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 25 206801 WET 03 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 7 August 2025 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| A0245/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 17 June 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0322/24EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 12 August 2024 | Closed Approved |
| A0124/24EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 12 March 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 22 138274 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 April 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 251071 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5251 Dundas St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 138274 WET 03 SA · submitted 26 April 2022 · Closed · from registration SM32797 (Aukland Residences Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32797: Development application for a 52 storey mixed use building located at 5251 Dundas Strreet West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 138274 WET 03 SA at 5251 Dundas St W: This Site Plan Control application is proposing to permit a 50-storey mixed use development with a 3-storey podium. The building has 34,641 sm of gross floor area containing 552 dwelling units and 170 sm of ground floor retail space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for a 52 storey mixed use building located at 5251 Dundas Strreet West
Matched fields
- address
- 5251 DUNDAS ST
- application_address
- 5251 DUNDAS ST W
5251 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 251071 WET 03 OZ · submitted 23 December 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32797 (Aukland Residences Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32797: Development application for a 52 storey mixed use building located at 5251 Dundas Strreet West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 251071 WET 03 OZ at 5251 Dundas St W: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application proposing to permit a 50-storey mixed use development with a 3-storey podium. The building has 34,590 sm of gross floor area containing 552 dwelling units and 170 sm of ground floor retail space. . (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for a 52 storey mixed use building located at 5251 Dundas Strreet West
Matched fields
- address
- 5251 DUNDAS ST
- application_address
- 5251 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 3
4 lobbied · 265 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 265 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.