51 Bayview Wood

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 9; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Location: 43.72730, -79.38309
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 11 January 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0004/24NYAccepted · In progress
Submitted 1 October 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0501/20NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 1 October 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0502/20NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 1 October 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0032/20NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 27 June 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0467/19NYDeferred · In progress
Submitted 27 June 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0468/19NYDeferred · In progress
Submitted 5 November 2014Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0867/14NYOMB Appeal · Approved
Submitted 5 November 2014Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0868/14NYOMB Appeal · Approved
Submitted 5 November 2014Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0064/14NYOMB Appeal · Approved

Data table· 9 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0004/24NY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	11 January 2024	Accepted In progress
A0501/20NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	1 October 2020	Closed Approved
A0502/20NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	1 October 2020	Closed Approved
B0032/20NY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	1 October 2020	Closed Approved
A0467/19NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	27 June 2019	Deferred In progress
A0468/19NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	27 June 2019	Deferred In progress
A0867/14NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	5 November 2014	OMB Appeal Approved
A0868/14NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	5 November 2014	OMB Appeal Approved
B0064/14NY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	5 November 2014	OMB Appeal Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 15

2 lobbied · 26 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 4 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 15: 2 lobbied and 26 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	26	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.