Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
49 Jackes Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.68536, -79.39040
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Layton, Ward 11 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 16 November 2020 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30953 | New Rock Consultants Inc. | 49 Jackes Ave | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 7 December 2020 – 31 December 2021 | 0 |
| SM30862 | Lifetime Developments | 49 Jackes Avenue. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 16 November 2020 – 2 December 2024 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 4 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 234392 STE 11 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 25 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 230439 STE 11 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 8 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 226916 STE 11 OZOMB Approved · Approved
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 234392 STE 11 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 4 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 230439 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 226916 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 8 December 2020 | OMB Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
49 Jackes Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 230439 STE 11 SA · submitted 25 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM30953 (New Rock Consultants Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30953: Proposed development at 49 Jackes Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 230439 STE 11 SA at 49 Jackes Ave: Site plan approval for a 19-storey residential building. Related Zoning By-law Amendment application approved at the Ontario Land Tribunal on November 26, 2024, final order pending fulfillment of conditions. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development at 49 Jackes Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 49 JACKES AVE
- application_address
- 49 JACKES AVE
49 Jackes Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 226916 STE 11 OZ · submitted 8 December 2020 · OMB Approved · from registration SM30862 (Lifetime Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30862: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for the proposed redevelopment of the site lcoated at 49 Jackes Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 226916 STE 11 OZ at 49 Jackes Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (Case No. OLT-21-001809). OLT approved (final order pending fulfillment of conditions) a 19-storey residential building. The Official Plan Amendment is required to permit a tall building on the site within t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for the proposed redevelopment of the site lcoated at 49 Jackes Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 49 JACKES AVE
- application_address
- 49 JACKES AVE
49 Jackes Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 226916 STE 11 OZ · submitted 8 December 2020 · OMB Approved · from registration SM30953 (New Rock Consultants Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30953: Proposed development at 49 Jackes Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 226916 STE 11 OZ at 49 Jackes Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (Case No. OLT-21-001809). OLT approved (final order pending fulfillment of conditions) a 19-storey residential building. The Official Plan Amendment is required to permit a tall building on the site within t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development at 49 Jackes Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 49 JACKES AVE
- application_address
- 49 JACKES AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.