Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
480 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66250, -79.38395
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 17 November 2021 |
| Chris Moise | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 10 April 2024 |
| Chris Moise | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 10 April 2024 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30640 | QuadReal Property Group Limited Partnership | 480 Yonge St. | Planning and Development | 29 September 2020 – 31 December 2026 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 30 August 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0820/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 29 November 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 257497 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 267350 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0820/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 30 August 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 16 257497 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 November 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 267350 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
480 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 257497 STE 27 SA · submitted 29 November 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23888 (480 Yonge Street Limited Partnership)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM23888: 480-494 Yonge Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 257497 STE 27 SA at 480 Yonge St: Site Plan Approval application to redevelop the site and build a new mixed-use 38-storey (131 metre including mechanical penthouse) with 2,250 sq. metres of commercial uses in a two-storey base building and residential uses on the upper floors. The existing clock tower will be maintained and incorp… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 480-494 Yonge Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 480-494 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 480 YONGE ST
480 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 257497 STE 27 SA · submitted 29 November 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24210 (480 Yonge Street Limited Partnership)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24210: 480 to 494 Yonge Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 257497 STE 27 SA at 480 Yonge St: Site Plan Approval application to redevelop the site and build a new mixed-use 38-storey (131 metre including mechanical penthouse) with 2,250 sq. metres of commercial uses in a two-storey base building and residential uses on the upper floors. The existing clock tower will be maintained and incorp… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 480 to 494 Yonge Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 494 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 490 YONGE ST
480 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 267350 STE 27 OZ · submitted 23 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM23888 (480 Yonge Street Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23888: 480-494 Yonge Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 267350 STE 27 OZ at 480 Yonge St: The rezoning application proposes to redevelop the site and build a new mixed-use 38-storey (131 metre including mechanical penthouse) with 2,250 sq. metres of commercial uses in a two-storey base building and residential uses on the upper floors. The existing clock tower will be maintained and inc… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 480-494 Yonge Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 480-494 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 480 YONGE ST
480 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 267350 STE 27 OZ · submitted 23 December 2014 · Closed · from registration SM24210 (480 Yonge Street Limited Partnership)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24210: 480 to 494 Yonge Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 267350 STE 27 OZ at 480 Yonge St: The rezoning application proposes to redevelop the site and build a new mixed-use 38-storey (131 metre including mechanical penthouse) with 2,250 sq. metres of commercial uses in a two-storey base building and residential uses on the upper floors. The existing clock tower will be maintained and inc… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 480 to 494 Yonge Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 494 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1 GROSVENOR ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.