Address · Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
4740-4742 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Location
- 43.65288, -79.52544
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 4740 DUNDAS ST W.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 8 March 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0107/23EYKClosed · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0107/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 March 2023 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
4740-4742 Dundas St W · Minor variance (MV)
A0107/23EYK · submitted 8 March 2023 · Closed · from registration SM34525 (Prince Edward Animal Clinic)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.97
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34525: Minor Variance Application A0107/23EY 4740 Dundas St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0107/23EYK at 4740-4742 Dundas St W: To permit a parking deficiency for the proposed medical clinic with ancillary pharmacy. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance Application A0107/23EY 4740 Dundas St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 4740 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 4740-4742 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 2
7 lobbied · 115 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 115 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.