Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
47 Hayden St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66972, -79.38412
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 49 HAYDEN ST (2 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 10 November 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 249782 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 249782 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 November 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
50 Charles St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 249782 STE 27 SA · submitted 10 November 2014 · Closed · from registration SM19635 (Cresford (Rosedale) Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19635: 50 - 60 and 62 - 64 Charles Street East, and 47 - 61 Hayden Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 249782 STE 27 SA at 50 Charles St E: To obtain Site Plan approval for the construction of a 55-storey residential tower fronting Charles Street East connected to a 8-storey office building fronting Hayden Street. The overall development would have a total gross floor area of 45764 square metres, with 36598 square metres of residential… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 - 60 and 62 - 64 Charles Street East, and 47 - 61 Hayden Street
Matched fields
- address
- 62-64 CHARLES ST E
- application_address
- 62 CHARLES ST E
50 Charles St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 249782 STE 27 SA · submitted 10 November 2014 · Closed · from registration SM19812 (Cresford (Rosedale) Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19812: 50 Charles Street, Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law and Site Plan Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 249782 STE 27 SA at 50 Charles St E: To obtain Site Plan approval for the construction of a 55-storey residential tower fronting Charles Street East connected to a 8-storey office building fronting Hayden Street. The overall development would have a total gross floor area of 45764 square metres, with 36598 square metres of residential… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 Charles Street, Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law and Site Plan Application
Matched fields
- address
- 50 CHARLES ST
- application_address
- 50 CHARLES ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.