Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
46 Hopedale Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.69439, -79.35322
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 29 September 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0693/26TEYAccepted · In progress
- Submitted 19 June 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0470/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 28 March 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5605885Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 11 December 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5555144Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 13 September 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5511591Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 July 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5482978Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 23 August 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1014/22TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0693/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 September 2026 | Accepted In progress |
| A0470/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 19 June 2025 | Closed Approved |
| COA-5605885 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 28 March 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-5555144 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 11 December 2024 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-5511591 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 September 2024 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-5482978 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 July 2024 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A1014/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 August 2022 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14
4 lobbied · 69 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.