Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
45 Strachan Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.63947, -79.41070
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 14 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ausma Malik | Councillor staff | 19 | 0 | 8 May 2024 |
| Councillor Joe Cressy | Councillor staff | 8 | 0 | 7 February 2022 |
| Toronto Building | City staff | 7 | 0 | 17 June 2020 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 14 February 2018 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 4 | 2 | 29 May 2024 |
| Development Review | City staff | 3 | 1 | 11 March 2025 |
| City Manager's Office | City staff | 2 | 2 | 25 June 2020 |
| Infrastructure & Development Services | City staff | 2 | 2 | 25 June 2020 |
| Transportation Services | City staff | 2 | 0 | 6 October 2020 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 31 October 2018 |
| Ausma Malik | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 8 May 2024 |
| City Planning | City staff | 1 | 1 | 11 March 2025 |
| Development and Growth Services | City staff | 1 | 1 | 7 April 2025 |
| Office of the Chief of Staff | City staff | 1 | 1 | 5 March 2020 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27356 | BentallGreenOak (Canada) Limited Partnership | 45 Strachan Avenue. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 January 2019 – 31 December 2025 | 22 |
| SM26222 | BK Prime (Ontario) Limited Partnership | 45 Strachan Avenue. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 15 May 2018 – 15 April 2027 | 32 |
| SM24616 | Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP | 45 Strachan Avenue. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 26 May 2017 – 31 December 2018 | 1 |
| SM24270 | Diamondcorp | 45 Strachan Avenue. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 27 March 2017 – 1 August 2023 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 1 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0217/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 150447 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 August 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 230482 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 August 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 223589 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0217/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 March 2019 | Closed Approved |
| 18 150447 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 230482 STE 19 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 August 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 223589 STE 19 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 August 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
45 Strachan Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 150447 STE 19 SA · submitted 30 April 2018 · Closed · from registration SM24270 (Diamondcorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24270: Matters relating to the development of 11/25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 150447 STE 19 SA at 45 Strachan Ave: The proposed development consists of a purpose-built 39-storey rental apartment tower that incorporates a 6-storey base podium with commercial uses at-grade. The proposed building will contain 433 rental apartments units, a 385 square metre commercial unit at-grade, 212 parking spaces, 530 bicycle … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to the development of 11/25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 25 ORDNANCE ST
- application_address
- 25 ORDNANCE ST
45 Strachan Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 150447 STE 19 SA · submitted 30 April 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26222 (BK Prime (Ontario) Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26222: Assisting with the development of 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 150447 STE 19 SA at 45 Strachan Ave: The proposed development consists of a purpose-built 39-storey rental apartment tower that incorporates a 6-storey base podium with commercial uses at-grade. The proposed building will contain 433 rental apartments units, a 385 square metre commercial unit at-grade, 212 parking spaces, 530 bicycle … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 25 ORDNANCE ST
- application_address
- 25 ORDNANCE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.