Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
45 Cummer Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78711, -79.41541
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 20 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 31 | 21 | 19 September 2017 |
| Planning, Community Planning | City staff | 14 | 14 | 6 July 2015 |
| Planning, Urban Design | City staff | 14 | 14 | 26 June 2015 |
| Legal Services Division | City staff | 11 | 9 | 27 January 2016 |
| Councillor Shiner | Councillor staff | 10 | 6 | 8 May 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Shiner, Ward 24 | Councillor staff | 9 | 7 | 1 June 2017 |
| Community Planning (North York District, Central) | City staff | 8 | 6 | 9 July 2015 |
| Planning- Community Planning | City staff | 8 | 6 | 9 July 2015 |
| Councillor Shiner, Ward 24 | Councillor staff | 6 | 6 | 27 January 2016 |
| Legal Services | City staff | 5 | 5 | 27 January 2016 |
| Planning, North York District | City staff | 5 | 5 | 9 July 2015 |
| City Planning, Urban Design (North York District) | City staff | 4 | 4 | 26 June 2015 |
| Planning, Community Planning-Scarborough District | City staff | 4 | 4 | 6 July 2015 |
| Planning, Urban Design (North York District) | City staff | 4 | 4 | 26 June 2015 |
| Planning- Community Planning- Scarborough District | City staff | 4 | 4 | 6 July 2015 |
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 9 July 2015 |
| Real Estate | City staff | 2 | 2 | 27 January 2016 |
| Affordable Housing Office | City staff | 1 | 1 | 3 July 2015 |
| Office of Councillor Shiner. Ward 24 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 31 March 2016 |
| Ward 38 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 July 2015 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM21939 | Silvercore Inc. | 45 Cummer Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 8 June 2015 – 19 June 2018 | 54 |
| SM21647 | Silvercore Inc. | 45 Cummer Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 10 April 2015 – 23 August 2018 | 91 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 6 March 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 125604 NNY 24 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 5 October 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 287471 NNY 24 OZOMB Approved · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 125604 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 March 2018 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 October 2011 | OMB Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5799-5915 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 125604 NNY 24 SA · submitted 6 March 2018 · Final Approval Completed · from registration SM25049 (2591260 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25049: Development application at the Newtonbrook Plaza site in North York Centre (address, 5915 Yonge Street). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 125604 NNY 24 SA at 5799-5915 Yonge St: Site plan approval application for the first phase (Block 1) of the Newtonbrook Plaza re-development. Phase 1 includes two mixed-use towers of 34 and 32 storeys with a total of 810 residential units. A total gross floor area of 73,345.6 square metres is proposed, of which 65,100 square metres will … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application at the Newtonbrook Plaza site in North York Centre (address, 5915 Yonge Street).
Matched fields
- address
- 5915 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
5799-5915 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 287471 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 5 October 2011 · OMB Approved · from registration SM15544 (Silvercore Properties Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM15544: Representative for a rezoning and official plan amendment at Netwonbrook Plaza (main address 5799 Yonge Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ at 5799-5915 Yonge St: Proposed redevelopment of the 'Newtonbrook Plaza' and adjacent lands for a mixed-use project with 1,674 residential units in 3 blocks with 4 buildings of 28, 36, 36 and 44 storeys, at-grade retail uses, office uses, townhouses and a new public park and street. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Representative for a rezoning and official plan amendment at Netwonbrook Plaza (main address 5799 Yonge Street)
Matched fields
- address
- 5799 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.