Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
44 Edinburgh Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.74204, -79.43482
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Pasternak, Ward 10 | Councillor staff | 3 | 2 | 7 May 2015 |
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 7 May 2015 |
| Community Planning | City staff | 1 | 0 | 27 March 2015 |
| Toronto Building | City staff | 1 | 0 | 12 March 2015 |
| Transportation | City staff | 1 | 0 | 27 March 2015 |
| Office of Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 10 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 19 March 2015 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM21530 | Beth Joseph Lubavitch | 44 Edinburgh Drive | By-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 11 March 2015 – 28 October 2015 | 10 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 10 February 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0064/26NYClosed · Refused
- Submitted 21 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0227/18NYApproved with Conditions · Approved
- Submitted 15 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4337681Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 19 December 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1111/16NYClosed · Approved
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0064/26NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 February 2026 | Closed Refused |
| A0227/18NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 March 2018 | Approved with Conditions Approved |
| COA-4337681 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 15 March 2018 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A1111/16NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 19 December 2016 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.