Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
415 King St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64529, -79.39441
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 28 August 2014 |
| Office of the Deputy Mayor | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 27 August 2014 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 15 July 2025 |
| Cluster B | City staff | 1 | 1 | 12 August 2014 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 11 August 2014 |
| Ward 32 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 11 August 2014 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35850 | Terracap Management Inc. | 415 King St West | Building Permits; Parking; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 16 August 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 2 |
| SM20749 | Terracap Management Inc. | 415 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 29 July 2014 – 8 December 2014 | 6 |
| SM20750 | Terracap Management Inc. | 415 King St. West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 29 July 2014 – 8 December 2014 | 2 |
| SM11687 | Joseph Abitol | 415 KING STREET WEST | PLANNING APPLICATION, SITE PLAN | 9 May 2008 – 9 May 2008 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 4 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 234412 STE 10 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 24 December 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 264673 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 16 June 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 197695 STE 20 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 14 February 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 111705 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 234412 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 4 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 264673 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 December 2019 | Under Review In progress |
| 10 197695 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 June 2010 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 08 111705 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 February 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
401-409 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 197695 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 June 2010 · OMB Approved · from registration SM17066 (Terracap Management Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17066: rezoning applications for 401-415 King St. West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 197695 STE 20 OZ at 401-409 King St W: Standard rezoning application for construction of new 55-storey mixed-use building (187 metres to the top of the mechancial penthouse) containing 2,273 square metres of retail use on two floors with residential above. A total of 615 residential units are proposed with 431 parking spaces in a 5 leve… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: rezoning applications for 401-415 King St. West
Matched fields
- address
- 401-415 KING ST W
- application_address
- 401-409 KING ST W
401-409 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 197695 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 June 2010 · OMB Approved · from registration SM17392 (Terracap Management Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17392: ZBA application re Proposed Mixed Use Development 401-415 King St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 197695 STE 20 OZ at 401-409 King St W: Standard rezoning application for construction of new 55-storey mixed-use building (187 metres to the top of the mechancial penthouse) containing 2,273 square metres of retail use on two floors with residential above. A total of 615 residential units are proposed with 431 parking spaces in a 5 leve… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application re Proposed Mixed Use Development 401-415 King St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 401-415 KING ST W
- application_address
- 401-409 KING ST W
401-409 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 197695 STE 20 OZ · submitted 16 June 2010 · OMB Approved · from registration SM18444 (117051 Ontario Ltd., Cabo Three Investments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18444: 401-415 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 197695 STE 20 OZ at 401-409 King St W: Standard rezoning application for construction of new 55-storey mixed-use building (187 metres to the top of the mechancial penthouse) containing 2,273 square metres of retail use on two floors with residential above. A total of 615 residential units are proposed with 431 parking spaces in a 5 leve… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 401-415 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 401-415 KING ST W
- application_address
- 401-409 KING ST W
415 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
08 111705 STE 20 SA · submitted 14 February 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11687 (Joseph Abitol)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11687: 415 KING STREET WEST, TORONTO (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 111705 STE 20 SA at 415 King St W: Site plan approval for new one storey commercial retail building located at the south-east corner of Spadina Avenue and King Street West, abutting substandard lane to the south. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 415 KING STREET WEST, TORONTO
Matched fields
- address
- 415 KING ST W
- application_address
- 415 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.