Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
4140 Finch Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Location
- 43.80357, -79.29015
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Mantas | Member of council | 26 | 2 | 19 May 2026 |
| Jamaal Myers | Member of council | 4 | 0 | 15 August 2023 |
| Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 7 September 2021 |
| Nick Mantas | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 11 May 2026 |
| Vincent Crisanti | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 11 March 2024 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34519 | North American Muslim Foundation | 4140 Finch Ave e | Planning and Development | 25 May 2023 – 27 August 2027 | 33 |
| SM32206 | North American Muslim Foundation | 4140 Finch Avenue East | Grants / Funding; Planning and Development | 12 August 2021 – 10 July 2025 | 2 |
| SM22106 | North American Muslim Foundation | 4140 Finch Ave East | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 10 August 2015 – 9 August 2016 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 3 June 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0167/16SCOMB Appeal · Refused
- Submitted 1 September 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 215969 ESC 41 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0167/16SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 June 2016 | OMB Appeal Refused |
| 15 215969 ESC 41 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 September 2015 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
4140 Finch Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 215969 ESC 41 SA · submitted 1 September 2015 · Under Review · from registration SM22106 (North American Muslim Foundation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22106: 4140 Finch Ave East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 215969 ESC 41 SA at 4140 Finch Ave E: INACTIVE Proposal for a partial demolition and interior alterations to allow for a private school in an existing industrial building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 4140 Finch Ave East
Matched fields
- address
- 4140 FINCH AVE E
- application_address
- 4140 FINCH AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 22
1 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22
7 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.