Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
411 Victoria Park Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.68876, -79.28689
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
11- Submitted 22 June 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0091/26SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 22 May 2026Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 26 165304 ESC 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 August 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 212439 ESC 20 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 16 January 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 105143 ESC 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 May 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0098/22SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 225178 ESC 20 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 20 December 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 263629 ESC 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 December 2019Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 19 263636 ESC 20 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 September 2013Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 13 233037 ESC 36 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 December 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 297365 ESC 36 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 October 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 285824 ESC 36 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 11 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0091/26SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 June 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 26 165304 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 May 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 25 212439 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 August 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 105143 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 January 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0098/22SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 May 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 225178 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 October 2021 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| 19 263629 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 263636 ESC 20 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 20 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 233037 ESC 36 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 10 September 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 297365 ESC 36 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 December 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 285824 ESC 36 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 October 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 20
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.