Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
410 Sherbourne St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66472, -79.37420
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Bradford | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 27 February 2024 |
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 13 April 2021 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31118 | Sorbara Group of Companies | 410 Sherbourne St | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 18 January 2021 – 31 December 2026 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 8 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 235374 STE 13 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 November 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 235163 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 7 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 235164 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 235374 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 8 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 235163 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 November 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 235164 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 7 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
410 Sherbourne St · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 235374 STE 13 CD · submitted 8 November 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM31118 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31118: 410 Sherbourne St - Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law Amendment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 235374 STE 13 CD at 410 Sherbourne St: *** Proposed Draft Plan of Condominium for a 39-storey mixed-use building containing 456 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 410 Sherbourne St - Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law Amendment
Matched fields
- address
- 410 SHERBOURNE ST
- application_address
- 410 SHERBOURNE ST
410 Sherbourne St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 235163 STE 13 OZ · submitted 7 November 2021 · Closed · from registration SM31118 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31118: 410 Sherbourne St - Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law Amendment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 235163 STE 13 OZ at 410 Sherbourne St: Application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a 42-storey mixed-use building at 410 Sherbourne Avenue. The proposal would contain 473 dwelling units, 84 vehicular parking spaces and 521 bike parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 410 Sherbourne St - Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law Amendment
Matched fields
- address
- 410 SHERBOURNE ST
- application_address
- 410 SHERBOURNE ST
410 Sherbourne St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 235164 STE 13 SA · submitted 7 November 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM31118 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31118: 410 Sherbourne St - Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law Amendment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 235164 STE 13 SA at 410 Sherbourne St: Site Plan Approval Application for a 42-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 240 square metres and a residential gross floor area of 31,273 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 410 Sherbourne St - Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law Amendment
Matched fields
- address
- 410 SHERBOURNE ST
- application_address
- 410 SHERBOURNE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.