lobbyTO

Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle

41 Chatsworth Dr

Registrations naming this address
6
5 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
4
2 offices contacted
Applications at this address
4
5 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Location
43.72185, -79.40328
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

6

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence3
  • Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence1
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 8 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council3215 December 2020
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1122 August 2017
All registrations· 6 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM30982Times Group Corporation41 Chatsworth DrivePlanning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law11 December 2020 – 11 December 20212
SM3095841 Chatsworth LP Inc.41 Chatsworth DrivePlanning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning…8 December 2020 – 30 June 20210
SM28196Times Group Corporation41 Chatsworth DriveBy-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development …14 May 2019 – 30 September 20210
SM28069Hashem Ghadaki41 Chatsworth DrPlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…24 April 2019 – 30 June 20190
SM24885Life Construction Inc.41 Chatsworth Dr.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law25 July 2017 – 12 August 20212
SM21161Parkset Development Inc41 Chatsworth DrivePlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…22 December 20140

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

4
Data table· 4 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
21 181286 NNY 08 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)8 July 2021Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 277580 NNY 16 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)20 December 2017Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 281456 NNY 16 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)27 December 2013Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 281459 NNY 16 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)27 December 2013Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 69 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=2

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied8%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 69 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied25—100% (n=3)0%8%0.00
Matched, unlobbied69—100% (n=2)0%4%0.00
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied33—100% (n=3)0%12%0.00
Matched, unlobbied57—100% (n=3)0%26%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.