Address · Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
41-75 Four Winds Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Location
- 43.76332, -79.49966
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 10 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Don Valley North | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 13 June 2022 |
| Ward 19 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 13 June 2022 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 13 June 2022 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
| Ward 1 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
| Ward 21 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
| Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
| Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
| Ward 5 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 May 2022 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33229 | Berncray Holdings Ltd | 41-75 Four Winds Drive | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 12 May 2022 – 30 September 2022 | 13 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 4 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 234132 WET 07 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 3 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 233673 WET 07 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 8 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 226957 WET 07 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 234132 WET 07 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 233673 WET 07 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 226957 WET 07 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 8 December 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
41-75 Four Winds Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 226957 WET 07 OZ · submitted 8 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM33229 (Berncray Holdings Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33229: Approval of Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 41-75 Four Winds Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 226957 WET 07 OZ at 41-75 Four Winds Dr: Zoning By-law Amendment to permit three buildings of 9, 11 and 32 storeys. The proposed development will provide a total of 43,745 m² (470,867 ft²) of gross floor area, comprised of 42,323 m² (455,561 ft²) of residential area and 1,422 m² (15,306 ft²) of retail/commercial area, resulting with a Flo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Approval of Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 41-75 Four Winds Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 41-75 FOUR WINDS DR
- application_address
- 41-75 FOUR WINDS DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7
5 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.