Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
40 Bay St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64344, -79.37900
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 20 | 20 | 31 May 2018 |
| Mayor'sOffice | Councillor staff | 7 | 7 | 31 May 2018 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 5 | 5 | 16 May 2018 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 16 May 2018 |
| Office of Councillor McConnell | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 18 May 2011 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25679 | Maple Leaf Sports &Entertainment Ltd. | 40 Bay Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Signs; Transportation - Roads / Bridges | 26 February 2018 – 1 July 2023 | 36 |
| SM16388 | Oxford Properties Group | 40 Bay Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 18 May 2011 – 31 August 2011 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 13 December 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 277737 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 June 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 220406 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 277737 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 December 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 220406 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 June 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
85 Harbour St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 220406 STE 28 SA · submitted 16 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM16388 (Oxford Properties Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16388: 85 Harbour Street office development and pedestrian bridge for PATH Connection from 40 Bay Street (Air Canada Centre) to 85 Harbour Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 220406 STE 28 SA at 85 Harbour St: Site Plan Approval for elevated PATH pedestrian bridge to connect the second floor of Waterpark Place Phase III at 10-20 Bay Street and 85 Harbour Street over the Harbour Street road allowance, across the west side of 90 Harbour Street site, over Lake Shore Boulevard West/under the Gardiner Express… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 85 Harbour Street office development and pedestrian bridge for PATH Connection from 40 Bay Street (Air Canada Centre) to 85 Harbour Stree…
Matched fields
- address
- 85 HARBOUR ST
- application_address
- 85 HARBOUR ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.