Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
390-400 Woodsworth Rd
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.76052, -79.36307
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32952 | Plaza Partners | 390-400 Woodsworth rd | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 4 March 2022 – 22 October 2022 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 22 October 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 229471 NNY 15 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 22 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 229475 NNY 15 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 229471 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 October 2021 | Council Approved Approved |
| 21 229475 NNY 15 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
390-400 Woodsworth Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 229471 NNY 15 OZ · submitted 22 October 2021 · Council Approved · from registration SM32952 (Plaza Partners)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32952: 390-400 Woodsworth rd (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 229471 NNY 15 OZ at 390-400 Woodsworth Rd: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Replacement to replace 80 townhouse units and permit three new 10, 9, and 8-storey mid-rise residential buildings along its Leslie Street frontage, containing a total of 603 new residential units. The proposal would include… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 390-400 Woodsworth rd
Matched fields
- address
- 390-400 WOODSWORTH RD
- application_address
- 390-400 WOODSWORTH RD
390-400 Woodsworth Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 229475 NNY 15 SA · submitted 22 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM32952 (Plaza Partners)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32952: 390-400 Woodsworth rd (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 229475 NNY 15 SA at 390-400 Woodsworth Rd: (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 390-400 Woodsworth rd
Matched fields
- address
- 390-400 WOODSWORTH RD
- application_address
- 390-400 WOODSWORTH RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 10% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 25% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.