Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng

384 Ruth Avenue

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 5; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Location: 43.79300, -79.40032
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 382 RUTH AVE (2 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Igor MartsenyukSM21899 · 4 June 20153
Igor MartsenyukSM20649 · 4 July 20142

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 24 Willowdale3
Office of Councillor Shiner, Ward1
Office of Councillor Shiner, Ward 241

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 24 Willowdale	Member of council	3	1	4 August 2015
Office of Councillor Shiner, Ward	Councillor staff	1	0	4 July 2014
Office of Councillor Shiner, Ward 24	Councillor staff	1	1	4 August 2015

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM21899	Igor Martsenyuk	384 Ruth Avenue.	Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance	4 June 2015 – 1 June 2016	3
SM20649	Igor Martsenyuk	384 Ruth Avenue	Planning and Development, Combined Application	4 July 2014 – 26 August 2014	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 19 February 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0183/16NYClosed · Approved

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0183/16NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	19 February 2016	Closed Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

384 Ruth Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A0183/16NY · submitted 19 February 2016 · Closed · from registration SM21899 (Igor Martsenyuk)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21899: Proposed minor variance applications for the dwellings proposed on the properties municipally known as 382 and 384 Ruth Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0183/16NY at 384 Ruth Ave: To construct a new two- storey detached dwelling with an integral garage. The existing dwelling would be demolished. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed minor variance applications for the dwellings proposed on the properties municipally known as 382 and 384 Ruth Avenue.
Matched fields
address
384 RUTH AVE
application_address
384 RUTH AVE

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 18

9 lobbied · 202 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 18: 9 lobbied and 202 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	202	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.