Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
383 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64634, -79.39656
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 26 November 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 254024 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 December 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 275276 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 254024 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 November 2019 | Under Review In progress |
| 17 275276 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
96 Spadina Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 254024 STE 10 SA · submitted 26 November 2019 · Under Review · from registration SM30495 (Allied REIT)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30495: ZBA & SPA Submissions for 96 Spadina; 379-391 Adelaide Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 254024 STE 10 SA at 96 Spadina Ave: INACTIVE Site Plan Approval application for a proposed 16-storey non-residential building comprised of office retail uses, and having a non-residential gross floor area of 21597 m2 (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA & SPA Submissions for 96 Spadina; 379-391 Adelaide Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 379-391 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 379 ADELAIDE ST W
96 Spadina Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 275276 STE 20 OZ · submitted 13 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM30495 (Allied REIT)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30495: ZBA & SPA Submissions for 96 Spadina; 379-391 Adelaide Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 275276 STE 20 OZ at 96 Spadina Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the construction of a 16-storey (plus mechanical penthouse) non-residential building with retail uses at ground and commercial uses above. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA & SPA Submissions for 96 Spadina; 379-391 Adelaide Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 379-391 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 379 ADELAIDE ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.