Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
375 OSLER STREET.
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.67339, -79.46120
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 376 OSLER ST (1 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 14 | 9 | 19 December 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22633 | Graywood Developments Ltd. | 375 Osler Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 7 January 2016 – 17 August 2022 | 13 |
| SM16116 | Bachly Construction | 375 OSLER STREET. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 4 April 2011 – 5 May 2012 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 28 June 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 180282 STE 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 March 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 133568 WET 17 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 180282 STE 09 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 28 June 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 133568 WET 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 March 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1771 St Clair Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 133568 WET 17 SA · submitted 30 March 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22633 (Graywood Developments Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22633: Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 133568 WET 17 SA at 1771 St Clair Ave W: Proposed six-storey mixed-use building with commercial at grade and 72 residential dwelling units above. 53 total parking spaces would be provided with 49 in a below-grade garage and 4 surface visitor spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 367&375 OSLER ST
- application_address
- 367 OSLER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.