Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
375 Kennedy Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.71356, -79.25929
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parthi Kandavel | Councillor staff | 13 | 13 | 30 July 2025 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Member of council | 7 | 6 | 30 July 2025 |
| Central Section (Wards 20, 21 and 24) | City staff | 2 | 2 | 27 April 2021 |
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 19 September 2022 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35465 | 462017 Ontario Limited | 375 Kennedy Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 2 April 2024 – 30 November 2026 | 10 |
| SM35329 | Cope Group Inc. | 375 Kennedy Road | Planning and Development | 16 February 2024 – 31 December 2024 | 4 |
| SM33668 | Laurier Paradise CC 375 Kennedy Inc. | 375 Kennedy Road | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 16 September 2022 – 16 September 2027 | 1 |
| SM30875 | Laurier Paradise CC 375 Kennedy Inc. | 375 Kennedy Road | Planning and Development Application | 17 November 2020 – 31 July 2027 | 6 |
| SM30740 | Cope Development Corp. | 375 Kennedy Road | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Developme… | 21 October 2020 – 31 January 2022 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 9 November 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 235806 ESC 20 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 9 November 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 235814 ESC 20 SBUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 235806 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 235814 ESC 20 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 9 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 20
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.