Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
374 Dupont St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67434, -79.41050
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 10 February 2026Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 26 115440 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 232443 STE 11 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 233616 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 115440 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 February 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 232443 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 233616 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
374 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
26 115440 STE 11 OZ · submitted 10 February 2026 · Closed · from registration SM33900 (Resident)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33900: 374-388 Dupont Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 26 115440 STE 11 OZ at 374 Dupont St: The proposal is for a 16-storey mixed-use building containing 257 dwelling units and 813 square metres of at-grade retail space along the Dupont Street frontage. The development includes 75 vehicular parking spaces and 144 bicycle parking spaces. The total gross floor area is approximately 17,934 s… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 374-388 Dupont Street
Matched fields
- address
- 374-388 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 374 DUPONT ST
374 Dupont St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 232443 STE 11 SA · submitted 31 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM33900 (Resident)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33900: 374-388 Dupont Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 232443 STE 11 SA at 374 Dupont St: Proposal revised:A 16-storey mixed-use building with a wrapped MPH/Amenity at Level 16. Proposal contains 257 dwelling units and 811 square metres of at-grade retail space along the Dupont Street frontage. The proposal also includes 72 vehicular parking spaces and 142 bicycle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 374-388 Dupont Street
Matched fields
- address
- 374-388 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 374 DUPONT ST
390 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 233616 STE 11 OZ · submitted 23 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM33900 (Resident)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33900: 374-388 Dupont Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233616 STE 11 OZ at 390 Dupont St: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for a 12-storey mixed-use building, containing 256 residential dwelling units and 1,000 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. The Official Plan Amendment is required to permit the height and built form of the proposal.City Council a… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 374-388 Dupont Street
Matched fields
- address
- 374-388 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 374 DUPONT ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.