Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
368 Jane St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.65744, -79.48808
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
10- Submitted 14 May 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0425/26TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 March 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 123542 WET 13 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0487/17EYKApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0491/17EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0492/17EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0493/17EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0494/17EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0495/17EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0496/17EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 June 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0045/17EYKClosed · Approved
Data table· 10 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0425/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 May 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 18 123542 WET 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 1 March 2018 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| A0487/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0491/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0492/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0493/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0494/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0495/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0496/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| B0045/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 1 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 4
8 lobbied · 130 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 130 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.