Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley

360 Evans Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 4; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 2; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Location: 43.61733, -79.52359
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Delta BingoSM32991 · 28 February 20220

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM32991	Delta Bingo	360 Evans Avenue.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla…	28 February 2022 – 28 February 2023	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 19 May 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0169/26EYKClosed · Refused
Submitted 23 December 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 253116 WET 03 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Submitted 30 May 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0332/22EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 15 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 238064 WET 03 SANOAC Issued · Approved

Data table· 4 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0169/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	19 May 2026	Closed Refused
24 253116 WET 03 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	23 December 2024	OMB Appeal In progress
A0332/22EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	30 May 2022	Closed Approved
21 238064 WET 03 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	15 November 2021	NOAC Issued Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

360 Evans Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 238064 WET 03 SA · submitted 15 November 2021 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM32991 (Delta Bingo)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32991: Re-zoning of property at 360 Evans Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 238064 WET 03 SA at 360 Evans Ave: This application is a reimagined surface parking lot and building facade to support a new Bingo Hall. The Toronto Official Plan designation is Core Employment Areas. The use is permitted as per MV 22 153478. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re-zoning of property at 360 Evans Avenue.
Matched fields
address
360 EVANS AVE
application_address
360 EVANS AVE

Council and committee items naming this address

360 Evans Avenue - Minor Variance Appeal at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
2023.MM2.5 · 15 December 2022
Delta Bingo & Gaming Proposed Relocation to 360 Evans Avenue - by Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata
2023.MM6.5 · 11 May 2023

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3

4 lobbied · 265 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3: 4 lobbied and 265 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	265	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3

37 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied16%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3: 37 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 25 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	37	—	100% (n=4)	0%	16%	0.27
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied71% n=10

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied29%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	24	—	100% (n=5)	0%	4%	0.25
Matched, unlobbied	100	—	71% (n=10)	29%	4%	0.14

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide