Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
355 Church St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66035, -79.37852
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 23 January 2014 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18019 | Tridel and Family Service Toronto | 355 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 April 2012 – 31 October 2014 | 0 |
| SM17957 | Tridel Construction | 355 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 2 April 2012 – 28 June 2014 | 1 |
| SM11712 | Family Service Toronto | 355 CHURCH ST. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 23 August 2011 – 23 August 2011 | 1 |
| SM16985 | TRIDEL | 355 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium | 23 August 2011 – 22 August 2012 | 0 |
| SM16947 | Deltera Inc. | 355 Church Street. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 17 August 2011 – 31 December 2019 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 15 March 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0306/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 August 2016Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 16 215145 STE 27 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 June 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 173921 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 April 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 162027 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0306/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 15 March 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 16 215145 STE 27 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 30 August 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 173921 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 June 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 162027 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 April 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
355 Church St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 173921 STE 27 SA · submitted 13 June 2014 · Closed · from registration SM17957 (Tridel Construction)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17957: Redevelopment of 355 Church Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 173921 STE 27 SA at 355 Church St: To permit a new 33-storey mixed use building. The proposed building consists of a four storey base building containing three town-house units, 3,188 sm of office space and 271 sm of commercial space. The 29-storey residential condo tower contains 337 residential units. 164 below below grade parking… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 355 Church Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 355 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 355 CHURCH ST
355 Church St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
14 173921 STE 27 SA · submitted 13 June 2014 · Closed · from registration SM18019 (Tridel and Family Service Toronto)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18019: municipal address: 355 Church Street client: Tridel (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 173921 STE 27 SA at 355 Church St: To permit a new 33-storey mixed use building. The proposed building consists of a four storey base building containing three town-house units, 3,188 sm of office space and 271 sm of commercial space. The 29-storey residential condo tower contains 337 residential units. 164 below below grade parking… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: municipal address: 355 Church Street client: Tridel
Matched fields
- address
- 355 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 355 CHURCH ST
355 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 162027 STE 27 OZ · submitted 26 April 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17957 (Tridel Construction)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17957: Redevelopment of 355 Church Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 162027 STE 27 OZ at 355 Church St: Rezoning application to permit a 33 storey mixed-use building including a four storey base building containing ground floor retail uses and three storeys of office space. The proposal includes 337 residential units and 164 parking spaces in four levels of underground parking. There are also 369 bic… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 355 Church Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 355 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 355 CHURCH ST
355 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 162027 STE 27 OZ · submitted 26 April 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18019 (Tridel and Family Service Toronto)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18019: municipal address: 355 Church Street client: Tridel (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 162027 STE 27 OZ at 355 Church St: Rezoning application to permit a 33 storey mixed-use building including a four storey base building containing ground floor retail uses and three storeys of office space. The proposal includes 337 residential units and 164 parking spaces in four levels of underground parking. There are also 369 bic… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: municipal address: 355 Church Street client: Tridel
Matched fields
- address
- 355 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 355 CHURCH ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.