Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
35 Tangiers Rd.
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.76297, -79.48843
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 30 TANGIERS RD (5 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 8 York West | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 21 September 2012 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18011 | 2310039 Ontario Inc. | 35 Tangiers Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 16 May 2012 – 31 December 2015 | 0 |
| SM18010 | FC Finanical Group | 35 Tangiers Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 11 April 2012 – 1 April 2016 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 5 October 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 238153 NNY 08 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 November 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 273550 NNY 08 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 November 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 273567 NNY 08 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 238153 NNY 08 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 5 October 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 273550 NNY 08 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 November 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 273567 NNY 08 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 November 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
35 Tangiers Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 273550 NNY 08 OZ · submitted 5 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18010 (FC Finanical Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18010: Commercial development application for a site loated on 35 Tangiers Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 273550 NNY 08 OZ at 35 Tangiers Rd: The proposal of a eight storey office building with retail at ground level (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Commercial development application for a site loated on 35 Tangiers Road
Matched fields
- address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
- application_address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
35 Tangiers Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 273550 NNY 08 OZ · submitted 5 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18011 (2310039 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18011: desire council and councillor's support for development at 35 Tangiers Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 273550 NNY 08 OZ at 35 Tangiers Rd: The proposal of a eight storey office building with retail at ground level (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: desire council and councillor's support for development at 35 Tangiers Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
- application_address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
35 Tangiers Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 273567 NNY 08 SA · submitted 5 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18010 (FC Finanical Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18010: Commercial development application for a site loated on 35 Tangiers Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 273567 NNY 08 SA at 35 Tangiers Rd: . The proposal of a eight storey office building with retail at ground level. Zoning By-law approved in 2014 (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Commercial development application for a site loated on 35 Tangiers Road
Matched fields
- address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
- application_address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
35 Tangiers Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 273567 NNY 08 SA · submitted 5 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18011 (2310039 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18011: desire council and councillor's support for development at 35 Tangiers Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 273567 NNY 08 SA at 35 Tangiers Rd: . The proposal of a eight storey office building with retail at ground level. Zoning By-law approved in 2014 (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: desire council and councillor's support for development at 35 Tangiers Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
- application_address
- 35 TANGIERS RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.