Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
3429 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.64394, -79.52515
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
8These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 6 | 2 | 9 December 2024 |
| Councillor Grimes, Ward 3 | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 20 June 2019 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 12 September 2017 |
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 9 October 2024 |
| Frances Nunziata | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 13 March 2025 |
| Jennifer McKelvie | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 25 November 2022 |
All registrations· 8 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35688 | DCMS Realty Developments Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Seniors | 19 June 2024 – 19 December 2026 | 2 |
| SM34314 | DCMS Realty Developments Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Seniors | 14 March 2023 – 1 September 2023 | 1 |
| SM33902 | DCMS Realty Developments Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Seniors | 25 November 2022 – 15 March 2023 | 5 |
| SM28289 | DCMS Realty Developments Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Seniors | 3 June 2019 – 6 July 2022 | 3 |
| SM28258 | DCMS Realty Developments Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Seniors | 29 May 2019 – 26 March 2025 | 3 |
| SM28259 | DCMS Realty Developments Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Seniors | 29 May 2019 – 19 December 2026 | 2 |
| SM24929 | DCMS (Bloor-Islington) Inc. | 3429 Bloor Street West. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 8 August 2017 | 1 |
| SM23349 | DCMS Realty | 3429 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 25 July 2016 – 1 March 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 9 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0263/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 June 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 172320 WET 03 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 28 June 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 188915 WET 05 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0263/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 9 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 21 172320 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 June 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 17 188915 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 June 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
3429 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 188915 WET 05 OZ · submitted 28 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM23349 (DCMS Realty)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23349: Development Application for 3429 Bloor Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 188915 WET 05 OZ at 3429 Bloor St W: Offical Plan Amendment and Rezoning application to construct a 14 storey retirement and assisted living facility. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Application for 3429 Bloor Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 3429 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 3429 BLOOR ST W
3429 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 188915 WET 05 OZ · submitted 28 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24929 (DCMS (Bloor-Islington) Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24929: Development application on behalf of our client that requires OPA and ZBA applications for the proposed redevelopment of 3429 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 188915 WET 05 OZ at 3429 Bloor St W: Offical Plan Amendment and Rezoning application to construct a 14 storey retirement and assisted living facility. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …evelopment application on behalf of our client that requires OPA and ZBA applications for the proposed redevelopment of 3429 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 3429 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 3429 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 3
4 lobbied · 265 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 265 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.