340 Mill Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 26; 5 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Location: 43.63986, -79.58561
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Mohican Holdings LimitedSM27003 · 13 November 201824
Park Property Management Inc.SM27417 · 24 January 20191
Mohican Holdings LimitedSM26978 · 9 November 20181

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Municipal Licensing & Standards8
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre7
Stephen Holyday5
Stephen Holyday4
Noice Enforcement2

Data table· 5 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Municipal Licensing & Standards	City staff	8	4	29 July 2026
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	7	4	27 May 2022
Stephen Holyday	Member of council	5	3	4 August 2026
Stephen Holyday	Councillor staff	4	2	29 July 2026
Noice Enforcement	City staff	2	0	4 August 2026

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM27417	Park Property Management Inc.	340 Mill Road	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	24 January 2019 – 31 December 2021	1
SM27003	Mohican Holdings Limited	340 Mill Road	Planning and Development, Combined Application	13 November 2018 – 31 December 2026	24
SM26978	Mohican Holdings Limited	340 Mill Road	Planning and Development, Combined Application	9 November 2018 – 31 December 2025	1

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 11 August 2026Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0035/26EYKAccepted · In progress
Submitted 24 April 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0167/25EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 22 April 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0208/24EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 16 March 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 127956 WET 02 SANOAC Issued · Approved
Submitted 18 July 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 191585 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0035/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	11 August 2026	Accepted In progress
A0167/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	24 April 2025	Closed Approved
A0208/24EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	22 April 2024	Closed Approved
21 127956 WET 02 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	16 March 2021	NOAC Issued Approved
19 191585 WET 02 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	18 July 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 2

2 lobbied · 22 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 4 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 2: 2 lobbied and 22 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	22	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 2

7 lobbied · 115 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 2: 7 lobbied and 115 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	115	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2

5 lobbied · 15 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2: 5 lobbied and 15 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	15	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.