Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
3315 Midland Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Location
- 43.80740, -79.28845
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 23 Scarborough North | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 20 April 2021 |
| Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 22 March 2018 |
| Cynthia Lai | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 5 February 2021 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31150 | 3315 Midland Inc | 3315 Midland Avenue | Planning and Development Application | 20 January 2021 – 20 January 2022 | 4 |
| SM26607 | Alfred Yang | 3315 Midland Avenue. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 1 June 2018 – 1 June 2019 | 0 |
| SM25845 | 3315 Midland Inc | 3315 Midland Avenue | Planning and Development, Heritage | 13 March 2018 – 31 October 2018 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 20 April 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 143597 ESC 23 OZUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 143597 ESC 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 April 2021 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.