Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
3314 Kingston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.73454, -79.22252
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 13 March 2018 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25782 | 3310 Kingston Development Inc. | 3314 Kingston Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 6 March 2018 – 5 March 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 17 November 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 219229 ESC 20 OZAppeal Received · In progress
- Submitted 17 November 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 219253 ESC 20 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 16 April 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 151169 ESC 36 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 219229 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 November 2020 | Appeal Received In progress |
| 20 219253 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 November 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 13 151169 ESC 36 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 April 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
3312 Kingston Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 219229 ESC 20 OZ · submitted 17 November 2020 · Appeal Received · from registration SM32203 (Morrison Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32203: 3310 Kingston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 219229 ESC 20 OZ at 3312 Kingston Rd: Development comprising of an 11-storey mixed use (11th-storey is only an enclosed MPH and amenity space) building (total Gross Floor Area is 19,236.1 square metres) with two levels of below grade parking. 275 dwelling units and 407.5 square metres of non-residential at grade are proposed. Associate… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3310 Kingston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 3310 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 3310 KINGSTON RD
3312 Kingston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 219253 ESC 20 SA · submitted 17 November 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM33051 (Gryphon Development)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33051: 3310 Kingston Road Site Plan Approval (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 219253 ESC 20 SA at 3312 Kingston Rd: See File No: 20 219229 ESC 20 OZ for most current submission materials. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3310 Kingston Road Site Plan Approval
Matched fields
- address
- 3310 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 3310 KINGSTON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
- 3310, 3312 and 3314 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval2026.SC33.2 · 9 July 2026
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.