Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
3300 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.66582, -79.48037
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 13 March 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 129467 STE 04 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 26 May 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 165357 STE 04 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 129467 STE 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 March 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| 25 165357 STE 04 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 May 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
3316 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 165357 STE 04 OZ · submitted 26 May 2025 · Closed · from registration SM35849 (Terra Firma Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35849: 3296-3316 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mid-rise mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 165357 STE 04 OZ at 3316 Dundas St W: Zoning By-law Amendment for a 11-storey mixed-use building which includes a total of 191 residential dwelling units, including 6 rental replacement units and 384 square metres of retail space at grade. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3296-3316 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mid-rise mixed-use building.
Matched fields
- address
- 3296-3316 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 3296 DUNDAS ST W
3316 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 165357 STE 04 OZ · submitted 26 May 2025 · Closed · from registration SM35967 (Terra Firma Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35967: 3296-3316 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mid-rise mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 165357 STE 04 OZ at 3316 Dundas St W: Zoning By-law Amendment for a 11-storey mixed-use building which includes a total of 191 residential dwelling units, including 6 rental replacement units and 384 square metres of retail space at grade. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3296-3316 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mid-rise mixed-use building.
Matched fields
- address
- 3296-3316 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 3296 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.